right again, so people want to work here for the right reasons.
Joke no more, No one is giving oil to UK or USA. When we arm them we put a claus ,
we will but dates , frozen fish, shrimps, from you then we send Bush and Tony
Blaire who mess up the soup. Graph are good for the math but we need to go
deeper and know what these graphs mean. Are they railway tracks and get cut off
at a point and we get the train de-railed. I doubt but that is exactly what is
happening now in UK. Taxation and We, I, You, your relatives, and all to come
in future. Heed . This brings me to perhaps the biggest problem of all, which
is successive governments' inability to think radically. Obviously taxation is
a contentious issue. For years, though, governments have been terrified of
making any radical decisions because of the debacle of the poll tax two decades
ago. Margaret Thatcher's premiership was destroyed because this tax was widely
perceived as being unfair, leading to riots and widespread non-payment. As a
result whenever anyone suggests a far-reaching shake up to the tax system,
governments find every reason under the sun not to attempt it. This seems odd,
as they're always happy to attempt new and untried policies when it comes to
other areas of British life, such as the NHS and the welfare state. Without
radical thinking, we wouldn't have either of those two institutions. Adam Smith
in his general principles of taxation laid out several questions that every
government should ask themselves before drawing up a budget. Is the tax fair?
Can it be collected regularly? Can it be collected easily, and is the amount
brought in sufficient to justify the cost of collecting it? However at no point
does he warn against radical or innovative thinking. Radical does not necessarily
mean more taxation or more complex taxation, a distinction lost on some of its
critics. In the last few years a range of new ideas have been suggested
including the Robin Hood tax, the mansion tax, abolishing VAT, the land tax and
several dozen others. I'm not saying that any of these are necessarily the
solution to our problems, just that governments without proper study too often
dismiss them out of hand, simply because they're radical and radical equals
bad. If we have to pay tax, then let's have tax policy based on reasoned
argument and evidence rather than assumptions and dogma. To put it mildly we
live with tax the we pay tax and our sons pay taxes. When is the end, we have
no idea, even if you print jokes on the tax forms, it just does not work I thank
you Firozali A.Mulla DBA
Mister Fun:
You could suggest that such limitational opthamology may be indicative of progressive standardization within the complex of derivative effluvia in the elite liberal psychobabblology.
Dear Emailer:
I could. I didn't, but I could. May I suggest instead the blue sno cone. Please get back to me once you have determined what the flavor actually is.
***
Mister Fun:
People are studiously not putting new money to work in the stock market, which is now cared about mainly by traders and excitable financial journalists. The question about the stock market remains: Does anybody care? Is anybody buying these stocks besides hedge funds, robots and hedge-fund robots?
Dear Chuck Schwab:
At this point I would settle for knowing which one of the world's many fine currencies it is safest to stuff my mattress with.
***
Dear Mister Fun:
If the Cabrini rowhouses were gone and the YMCA bum factory on Chicago decommissioned, this place would be full. The financial burden low income housing, public housing and transient shelters puts on the real estate market is immeasurable in terms of lost tax revenues. One bum beating a woman can scare thousands of potential buyers away. The administration should make it priority number one to remove undesirables from the downtown zones
Dear Real Estate Mogul:
So you're saying the first bum I sent didn't work? You tell me how much 'local color' I have to send by and I will tell you what your home is worth.
***
Misterfun@Misterfunsaddress:
I am reasonably educated and I know countless well educated men and women who would endorse my view on this. Women no less than men do not believe either men or women should be allowed to be promiscuous or drink and then demand morality.
Dear Rasputin:
So we can skip repentance? Is that what you're saying? In any case, Mister Fun has never felt obligated to ask for anything more after a Saturday night of drunken sex. Going to church with her on Sunday morning was just my way of not being rude. Next time, we'll just go to Denny's and leave the pews to you non sinner types.
***
Mr. Fun:
Being liked is not the same as doing sh*t.
Dear S-head:
Being despised is no achievement, either. To be something, you must do something--or all you will ever be is pathetic. In short, I am joining with Mom in declaring your justification for inactivity not valid. The least you can do is pick up the basement, where you live FOR FREE.
***
Mister Jack Fun:
As long as "Shopping" is a recreational activity we will never begin to get control of our lives or the direction of our civilization. How many pairs of shoes do you own? Why do so many think that 40 or more pairs does not denote a problem.
Dear Newlywed:
Eventually the 40 pairs of shoes shock will fade. Then doilies will appear under all of your glasses and "treatments" upon your windows. Soon you will discover that all of her expensive dresses become useless and not wearable after three public viewings. After a time you will not notice these things. Or at least not feel compelled to comment on them. Note: New things makes living with the old you so much more tolerable.
***
Fun:
You can do this for a while, but eventually cut the crap.
***
Mister Fun appears only on the Hil-Gle WonderBlog and only when he feels like it!
No comments:
Post a Comment