The Things Themselves (Pulp
Magazines Today)
Pulp Magazines are now, for the
most part, gone. Very few publications which started at pulp magazines are still
in existence. A minority of the publishers still continue on, most of them in
aggregated form. The vices which the industry once became known for touting
have long since been adopted by other mediums. Although the pulp magazine may
have a fairly rich family tree, as an actual living form it would be fairly
easy to write off.
I am a little less sticky about
how I define pulp magazines and pulp fiction than most people are. In the
traditional sense, a pulp magazine is a newsprint publication with a glossy
cover. The format is similar to what you see from most puzzle and astrology
magazines. To be blunt, puzzle books and astrology magazines are pulp
magazines—and they seem to be about as healthy of a medium today as they were
since the 1960s. It’s portable pencil fun, suitable for passing the time at the
reception desk, in the airport, at the laundry or wherever quiet interactive
entertainment is allowed. Weirdly, the computers don’t seem to have encroached
all that much on this medium. The easy interface, the disposable nature of the
products, are hard to match. They have been holding fast to their widespread
retail space for as long as I have been alive and for perhaps twenty years
before then.
In classical terms, these
magazines are not pulp magazines. Pulp magazines generally contain fiction,
confined to a number of genres all traditionally labeled ‘romance’ or
‘escapist’ in the modern sense. It could be argued that astrology magazines are
escapist flash fiction, but that would be giving the randomly created astro
babble too much credit. Hoax news is certainly an established pulp genre, but
the peddling of Flash Hoax in the form of fortune cookie compilations should
fall beneath the category of any type of literature. What can be said without
fear of contradiction is that the crosswords and astrology books are brothers
of the Pulps. They were invented by Dell, a major pulp publisher. And many of
them were published by the same folks who published pulps originally.
Also plying this general form are
about six fiction digests. These include Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine,
Alfred Hitchcock’s Mystery Magazine, Analog, Asimov’s, the Magazine of Fantasy
and Science Fiction and Fate Magazine. Although all of them have adopted the
digest format many Pulps eventually reverted to, only two of them (Asimov’s and
Analog) started as Pulp magazines—and both under different publishers and
different names. With the exception of Fate Magazine, none of these titles is
currently in the business of printing up Pulp fiction. In the case of Asimov’s
and Analog, they have long drifted away from the thrill-a-page format. In the
case of the others, it was never their forte to begin with. Many of the digest
magazines were launched in an effort to break from the trends that seemed to
have doomed the pulps.
As for Fate Magazine, it’s an
astrology book. It’s an astrology book for people who think astrology is real.
If astrology books are marijuana, then Fate is cocaine. My opinion of its genre
is rather dim—that it is a straight-faced hoax. It is, however, a rather long
running hoax, today plying the new wave of the new age. (If people knew how old
New Age is, they would stop calling it that. Only the celebrated Young Turks
have had more grey hair.) Fate itself was started by a Pulp magazine editor who
got high on his own supply. Factually the straight faced hoax is a pulp genre,
a venerable one, and Fate is a surviving Pulp magazine. Like it or not.
Celebrity Gossip, a mutation of
the straight faced hoax, is also a Pulp genre. Other genres of pulp fiction
that I dislike include True Crime and Romantic Confessions. Here I think the
Pulp vehicles have largely died, although perhaps not at their own hands and
not due to market factors. All of the
True Crime magazines, most of which started as Pulp magazines in pulp format
put out by pulp magazine publishers became amalgamated by the same company. And
they were all cancelled at the same time in the 1990s. The exact same fate
happened to the True Confessions magazines, although at a later date and by
different hands. The True Crime magazines look like they are dead to stay. The
Romantic Confessions magazines may come back. But as of 2014 the whole shooting
match is kaput.
Which means that Fate Magazine is
the only pulp still being published, albeit in digest form. I should also
mention Weird Tales, which is still published in a sort of pulp format and
tries to carry on the type of literature it always plied. But there is some
question whether Weird Tales ever really was a Pulp magazine in the classic
sense of the word. It was never really “thrill fiction”, fast moving third
person narrative. Nor was Breezy Stories, for that matter.
If Weird Tales and Breezy Stories
weren’t pulp magazines, then there never was such a thing. If Fate is the only pulp
magazine still being published, then the medium is indeed dead. No one is making such obvious straw man
arguments, but there is a cadre within the dork points accumulation class who
might argue that Blue Book wasn’t a pulp because it was printed on slick papers
and that the entire output of Macfadden—king of the pulps—is not pulp for the
same reason. If the history of pulp magazines is confirned to objects of a
specific standard of manufacture—literally a standard of pages and binding—it’s
not much of a field and not much to be interested in.
In our next series of postings,
we will be covering the current state of Pulp: the traditional publishers, the
surviving formats, the great works, the characters spawned and the classic pulp
genres. And we’ll be covering the current Pulp Revival as well as the state of
Pulp Fandom
In Pulp it’s what’s on the page,
not the page itself that is interesting. It is a specific mindset, a narrow
grouping of genres, that defines Pulp. It isn’t necessarily era-bound, though it does
have a definable history. Now that I have dismissively covered physical things,
it will be my intention to outline the current state of the Pulp art.
No comments:
Post a Comment